USA: Kerry, Hegel Urge Congress to Back Use of Force against Assad Regime

The entire world is watching to see what the United States will do about the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime, and how America responds will make a difference, U.S. Secretary of State John F. Kerry told a Senate panel on Tuesday.

Kerry, along with Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, making the case for Congress to authorize the use of force against the regime of Bashar Assad.

 “We’re here because against multiple warnings from the president of the United States, from the Congress, from our friends and allies around the world, and even from Russia and Iran, the Assad regime — and only, undeniably, the Assad regime — unleashed an outrageous chemical attack against its own citizens,” Kerry said. “We’re here because a dictator and his family’s personal enterprise, in their lust to hold onto power, were willing to infect the air of Damascus with a poison that killed innocent mothers and fathers and hundreds of their children, their lives all snuffed out by gas in the early morning of Aug. 21.”

There is no doubt that the Assad regime killed these people, the secretary of state added.

Kerry said he wants to avoid a comparison to the early days of the resolution that led to the Iraq War. The administration has “scrubbed and rescrubbed” the evidence, and “we can tell you beyond any reasonable doubt that our evidence proves the Assad regime prepared for this attack, issued instruction to prepare for this attack, [and] warned its own forces to use gas masks,” Kerry said.

The humanitarian considerations are important, but there are strategic national security interests at stake as well, Kerry said. The United States needs “to avoid the creation of a safe haven in Syria or a base of operations for extremists to use these weapons against our friends,” he explained. Extremists on both sides could lay their hands on chemical weapons in Syria and use them outside the nation, he said.

Speaking about the decision to withdraw from the attack, Kerry said that Syria would regard America stepping away from a response as an invitation to use chemical weapons with impunity.

Iran, North Korea and Hezbollah all want the United States to step away, Kerry said.

“Our inaction would surely give them a permission slip for them to at least misinterpret our intention, if not to put it to the test,” he said. “Hezbollah is hoping that isolationism will prevail. North Korea is hoping that ambivalence carries the day. They are all listening for our silence.”

Allies in the region – Jordan, Israel and Turkey – “look next door and see they are one stiff breeze away from the potential of being hurt, of their civilians being killed, as a consequence of choices Assad might take in the absence of action,” Kerry said.

There are limits to the resolution, the secretary of state emphasized, noting that Obama has said there will be no American boots on the ground.

“We have no intention of assuming responsibility for Syria’s civil war,” he said. “[The president] is asking only for the power to make clear, to make certain, that the United States means what we say, [and] that the world, when we join together in a multilateral statement, means what we say.”

Emphasizing the need to protect U.S. national security interests, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee he supports President Barack Obama’s decision to seek congressional authorization for the use of force in Syria.

Explaining the rationale behind what he acknowledged was a difficult decision for the national security team, Hagel urged Congress to consider not only “the risks and consequences of action,” but also the consequences of inaction.

Syria’s actions risk eroding the nearly century-old international norm against the use of chemical weapons that has helped to protect the U.S. homeland and U.S. forces operating across the globe, the secretary said. Weakening that norm, he said, could embolden other regimes, such as North Korea, to acquire or use chemical weapons.

 “Given these threats to our national security, the United States must demonstrate through our actions that the use of chemical weapons is unacceptable,” Hagel said.

The Defense Department has developed military options to achieve these objectives and positioned U.S. assets throughout the region to successfully execute this mission, he reported.

“We believe we can achieve them with a military action that would be limited in duration and scope,” he told the Senate panel.

Hagel said he and Dempsey have assured Obama that U.S. forces will be ready to act whenever the president gives the order.

Meanwhile, officials are working with U.S. allies and partners, he said.

“Key partners, including France, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and [other] friends in the region have assured us of their strong support for U.S. action,” he reported.

Military actions being contemplated would be tailored specifically to the use of chemical weapons, he assured the panel.

Hagel called the decision to use military force “the most difficult decision America’s leaders can make,” and urged vigorous congressional debate on the issue.

[mappress]
Press Release, September 4, 2013