Naval Today
  • Vessels
  • Equipment & Technology
  • Operations
  • Capital Investments
  • Authorities
  • More news
JobsNewsletter
Naval Today logo

Your trusted source for naval and maritime news, part of the Navingo network.

Topics
  • Equipment & technology
  • Industry
  • Vessels
  • Operations
  • Training & Education
Network
  • NavalToday
  • Dredging Today
  • Offshore Wind
  • Offshore Energy
  • Maritieme Vacaturebank
Company
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • Report Your News
  • Privacy Policy

© 2026 Navingo. All rights reserved.

Home›News›USA: Moving Aircraft Carrier from VA to FL Cheaper than Navy Says
News

March 9, 2011 · about 15 years ago

USA: Moving Aircraft Carrier from VA to FL Cheaper than Navy Says

Moving a Norfolk-based aircraft carrier to Mayport, Fla., could cost less than half of what the Navy estimated it would, according to a federal report. The U.S. Government Accountability Office estimates the cost of moving a carrier to be between $258.7 million and $356 million. The Navy previously

FB

Fatima Bahtic

Naval Today

2 minutes read
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Email

Moving a Norfolk-based aircraft carrier to Mayport, Fla., could cost less than half of what the Navy estimated it would, according to a federal report.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office estimates the cost of moving a carrier to be between $258.7 million and $356 million. The Navy previously had estimated it would cost more than $537 million to upgrade the Florida base so it could be the home port for a nuclear-powered carrier.

Norfolk is the only home port for aircraft carriers on the East Coast. Defense officials say that’s a national security concern, citing threats of terrorism and natural disasters.

Mayport lost the conventionally powered John F. Kennedy in 2007, when it was decommissioned.

Virginia leaders are concerned about a possible move because the Hampton Roads region stands to lose 6,000 jobs, half of those sailors aboard a carrier, and $425 million in annual revenue if a carrier permanently sails to Mayport.

The state’s congressional delegation has called the proposal unnecessary and costly at a time when there are other pressing needs.

The GAO report released Thursday criticized how the Navy estimated its cost, saying it failed to conduct a comprehensive, well-documented and credible analysis.

The biggest difference between the GAO estimate and the Navy’s involves the cost of building new facilities at Mayport. The GAO puts the cost for ship maintenance support facilities at $45.6 million and for building a controlled industrial facility at $70.5 million. The Navy estimates those costs at $157.2 million and $139.1 million, respectively.

The Navy said the difference in costs is because it factored in the cost of protecting buildings from a potential storm surge that may come from a Category 4 hurricane. The GAO also said it included a hurricane factor in its estimate.

[mappress]

Source: Richmond Times-Dispatch , March 9, 2011;

Reach the Naval Today industry in one go!

Naval Today is read by thousands of professionals every day.

Increase your visibility with banners, tell your story with a branded article, and showcase your expertise with a full-page company profile in our business directory.

CONTACT

Follow Naval Today on:

Filed under

News

Daily naval, defence and maritime news in your mailbox.

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Trending Now

  1. 1Keel laid for US Navy's newest destroyer USS John E. Kilmer
  2. 2Iran captured a Dive-LD: what the US Navy underwater drone was built to do
  3. 3Babcock extends Seaspan's support for Canada’s Victoria-class subs
  4. 4Spanish Navy orders MBDA's SIMBAD RC anti-missile systems

Daily naval, defence and maritime news in your mailbox.

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Subscribe free